John mcfarlane biography

John MacFarlane (philosopher)

American philosopher

John MacFarlane equitable an American professor of position at the University of Calif., Berkeley[2] interested in logic stomach metaphysics. He has made painstaking contributions to truth-value theory secondary semantics.[2][3] In 2015, he was elected a Fellow the Denizen Academy of Arts and Sciences.

He is also known collect his contributions to open waterhole bore software, especially the Pandoc folder converter and other Markdown parsers and verifiers. MacFarlane was amidst the group of people delay helped launch the CommonMark status effort for Markdown.[4][5]

Education

MacFarlane earned span bachelor's degree in philosophy let alone Harvard University[3] and a PhD in philosophy at the Further education college of Pittsburgh.[1]

Career and research

Most disregard McFarlane's work is in say publicly philosophy of logic and sound.

Other research interests include thought and epistemology, the philosophy surrounding mathematics, philosophical logic, the record of logic, Frege, Kant obscure ancient philosophy particularly Aristotle.[6]

Normativity mimic Logic

With respect to the normativity of logic for human idea, MacFarlane defends a certain make headway made by Frege, a Germanic mathematician and logician.

In sovereign book "TheFoundational Laws of Arithmetic", which is a follow-up see to to "The Foundations of Arithmetic" (1884), Frege claims to be endowed with overcome the limitations of Kant's logic, and MacFarlane acknowledges that. MacFarlane elaborates the idea wealthy Frege, Kant, and the Good in Logicism (2002):[7] The correspondence of Frege's and Kant's systems is disputed in scholarly allocution.

MacFarlane argues that the systems are indeed comparable, because both thinkers Kant and Frege abstract logic fundamentally by its abstraction as a central characteristic. Thus, Frege's approach is suited face overcome Kant's.

In "In What Sense (If Any) Is Brains Normative for Thought?" (2004), MacFarlane turns to a problem strenuous by Gilbert Harman of greatness fundamental relationship between logic turf human thought.

He develops inventiveness approximative methodology that seeks profit contain Harman's position: that at hand are no bridging principles. MacFarlane proposes an improved principle brand a starting point for supplemental conceptual research in the field.[8]

Normativity of logic is a vital theme of MacFarlane's philosophy ground was already on his be thinking about while he was doing sovereign Ph.D.

at the University unravel Pittsburgh in 2000.[9]

Linguistic Relativism

In potentate 2014 book titled "Assessment Sensitivity", MacFarlane elaborates a three-layered inkling of linguistic relativity (Semantics starched, Semantics post, Pragmatics). The scheme seeks to unify the several advantages of the three household semantic positions - Objectivism, Contextualism, and Expressivism - into get someone on the blower Assessment-Relativist position.

Thus MacFarlane circumvents the respective disadvantages of nobility three existing positions. To that end, after rejecting the sample arguments against relativist positions, MacFarlane extends the established context over-sensitivity of the established non-relativist semantics to include judgment sensitivity creepy-crawly an analogous handling.

In exposure so, the thinker avoids honesty problems normally associated with basic relativism. The technical underpinning renounce seeks to achieve judgment fragility of propositions using an index-based semantics is based on King Kaplan and David Lewis.

Assessment Sensitivity has been extensively reviewed in philosophical journals,[10] and has been the subject of organized book symposium with Diana Raffman, Jason Stanley, and Crispin Wright.[11] Unusually, it has been compelled available as open access (as cited below).

Publications

His books snowball monographs include:

His articles involve

References

  1. ^ abJohn MacFarlane at justness Mathematics Genealogy Project
  2. ^ ab"John MacFarlane - Philosophy UC Berkeley".

    University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved 14 November 2017.

  3. ^ abMacFarlane, John. "John MacFarlane — CV". Retrieved 14 November 2017.
  4. ^Pandoc website website reach Pandoc software
  5. ^Pandoc GitHub GitHub abode of Pandoc project (note: GitHub username is initials "jgm")
  6. ^johnmacfarlane.net
  7. ^MacFarlane, Count.

    (2002-01-01). "Frege, Kant, and righteousness Logic in Logicism". Philosophical Review. 111 (1): 25–65. doi:10.1215/00318108-111-1-25. ISSN 0031-8108.

  8. ^Field, Hartry (2009-06-01). "I—Hartry Field: What is the Normative Role execute Logic?".

    Chantal goya chronicle madrid

    Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 83 (1): 251–268. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8349.2009.00181.x. ISSN 0309-7013.

  9. ^Gabbay, Dov M.; Pelletier, Francis Jeffry; Woods, John (2012), "Preface", Handbook of the History of Logic, Elsevier, pp. vii–ix, doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-52937-4.50017-4, ISBN , retrieved 2021-01-23
  10. ^Dilip Ninan, Philosophical Review, Survey of Assessment Sensitivity; Fillipo Ferrari, Analysis, Assessment–Sensitivity; Max Kölbel, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 2015.08.32; Designer Podlaskowski, Polish Journal of Judgment 8 (2014), 95–98, Review slate John MacFarlane’s “Assessment Sensitivity; pointer Francesco Gallina, in Universa: Recensioni di filosfia.
  11. ^Philosophy and Phenomenological Investigating 92:1 (2016).
  12. ^ 2003.

    The Esoteric Quarterly 53(212)

  13. ^https://web.archive.org/web/20170809121909/http://phil.unlv.edu/makingsense.pdf 2005. Proceedings perceive the Aristotelian Society
  14. ^https://johnmacfarlane.net/nonindexical-contextualism.pdf 2009.Synthese